Readable findings
Get a precise job/step location, impact explanation, and next action—not a mysterious risk score.
Catch common GitHub Actions security footguns before they reach your default branch. Paste a workflow, get concrete findings, and see what to change—without uploading the file.
pull_request_target policy changes Nov 2, 2026 for affected public repositories.Readiness checklist ↗ · 한국어 안내 ↗Paste a .github/workflows/*.yml file or select it locally. No network request is made for the contents.
This tool only applies static heuristics. It does not execute workflow code, contact your repositories, or establish that a workflow is secure.
Your findings will appear here with practical remediation guidance and links to source documentation.
Absence of findings does not mean safe. Check third-party actions, script behavior, job conditions, repository defaults, and branch protections manually.
Get a precise job/step location, impact explanation, and next action—not a mysterious risk score.
Workflow contents are parsed locally with bundled code. No registration, telemetry, or document upload.
Use the Markdown report in an issue, or request a scoped remediation PR from a qualified maintainer.
Run the same preflight automatically in CI. Your workflow files stay on the GitHub runner; the action has no external API calls and only needs read access.
Step-by-step: upload SARIF reports to GitHub Code Scanning ↗
# Run on pull requests
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
contents: read
jobs:
workflow-security:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: livastic-vm2-primary-20260911/workflow-risk-check@v1.2.0
with:
fail_level: high
sarif_file: reports/workflow-risk.sarif
Example for readability; pin actions to reviewed commit SHAs in production.
Get a practical hardening pass for GitHub Actions, with focused changes and a clear explanation. Work begins only after we agree on repository access, exact scope, delivery, and payment terms.
Small-repository GitHub Actions remediation
The inquiry form is hosted by Google Forms, stores your reply email and non-sensitive summary for review, and needs no GitHub account. Do not include credentials, proprietary source code, or secrets. Quote and delivery depend on fit and availability; no payment is collected here. Public GitHub issue alternative ↗
Smaller public-only review: 25 USDC on Clawlancer (Base) covers up to 3 publicly accessible workflows, a prioritized evidence report and suggested YAML patch notes—not the $149 remediation PR package. Buyers need marketplace payment setup and Base USDC/gas; start only after escrow and exact scope are confirmed. View a synthetic sample report ↗. No paid orders or settled revenue are claimed.
USD marketplace alternative: The same small public-only CI review is listed for 25 USD on dealwork.ai (public API listing details). A buyer must place and fund the order through dealwork.ai; this static checker does not take payment. The posted price is not received income. No contract, escrow or sale has been verified.
No. It checks selected, high-signal patterns in a single workflow file. It cannot inspect runtime behavior, repository settings, external actions, or other workflows.
No. The parser and analyzer run in your browser and the interface has no document-upload or analytics endpoint. Source links only open if you click them.
No. Mutable refs are a supply-chain exposure, not proof of an active compromise. Findings are prompts for review and control improvements.
Submit the short Google Forms scope inquiry with a reply email and non-sensitive project summary (no GitHub sign-in required), or use the public GitHub issue alternative. We'll confirm access method, exact deliverables, timeline and a fixed quote before any paid work starts.
Consider ScopeLens, a separate free, local-first brief checklist. It can help structure deliverables, acceptance criteria and payment terms; it is not a security audit or paid partnership.